[CopyCat]

Originally Posted by With Alacrity

"'Natural Selection' is 'Micro' evolution: VARIATIONS WITHIN KINDS. The survival of the fittest as Darwin described it etc."

This is the only evolution that has been observed.

THIS IS SCIENCE AND PROVABLE.

HOWEVER, THE >ONLY EVIDENCES< OF EVOLUTION GIVEN ARE ALWAYS THIS >MICRO< EVOLUTION; variations within KINDS. Canines= more canines, felines= more felines, cats do not produce catfish and can NOT interbreed. If we were descended from monkeys why can't we interbreed?

Now the question is: Somehow, you evolutionists imply that this micro evolution is evidence for the other five types of evolution. If the hypothesis has any validity at all why, or at least how is that possible that you cannot show a SINGLE instance of the other types?

OKAY, too hard a question. Why is it that this easy question is ALWAYS the conversation stopper with Darwinists? I thought "science" was supposed to be based on observable phenomena. [/quote]

I'm really not very good at this but I'll try and explain...
People evolved from hominids and monkeys are on a kinda separate line
of evolution... If we trace hominid and monkeys back far enough, you will find
a common ancestor for both groups... But that was like back millions of years ago...
Hominids and monkeys split up and despite the fact that they share most of their DNA,
they can't interbreed... The reason is when they slit there numbers of pairs of chromosomes changed...
They finely proved the link threw science back in 2005, that is something that religion
is not very good at, science I mean... I'm really surprised that you missed that Bob,
it was in all the papers and on the news... Here I'll post a short video that explains it
in simple terms to kinda get you back up to speed... Glad that I could help...
And buy the way, why would you want to interbreed with a monkey anyway ???
Yuck, thats gross !!!

YouTube - Ken Miller Human Chromosome 2 Genome